← Digital SAT Writing
03
Lesson 03 · Expression of Ideas

Rhetorical Synthesis

In this lesson, you will learn to

  • Recognize rhetorical synthesis ("bullet point") questions and understand their unique format.
  • Identify emphasis-style rhetorical synthesis questions and learn strategies for emphasizing similarities or differences.
  • Understand rhetorical synthesis questions that focus on the aim, methodology, or findings of research studies.
  • Apply effective strategies to select the answer that best utilizes notes to achieve a specified goal.

Rhetorical synthesis questions are always the last group of questions featured in a Reading Writing module. You can immediately identify them because they will always contain a group of between 4 and 6 bullet points.

On average, you will encounter 3 rhetorical synthesis questions per module, but you may encounter as few as 1 or as many as 6.

Rhetorical synthesis questions are unique to the DSAT. In other words, you won't see them on any other test. That means you should make sure you feel comfortable using the techniques described in this lesson.

Rhetorical synthesis questions always include the phrasing "While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes" and the previously mentioned bullet points.

The question always includes the phrasing "The student wants to…", and then it mentions a specific goal that the student is trying to accomplish. Finally, it says "Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?"

Rhetorical synthesis questions often tell you that a "student" wants to emphasize a particular feature of the information in the provided bullet points.

For example, you might be told, "The student wants to emphasize Tereshkova's most significant achievement" or "The student wants to emphasize the uniqueness of Tübke's style".

⚠️ WarningIn most rhetorical synthesis questions—particularly in easy and medium difficulty questions—it is not necessary to read the bullet points.

What is most important is the information after "The student wants to…". This is the goal that the correct answer needs to accomplish. You may want to highlight this part of the question in the Bluebook App.

🔎Here's a straightforward rhetorical synthesis question, with the goal bolded:

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:

  • The Via Appia was constructed between 312 and 264 BCE.
  • It was one of the earliest and strategically most important Roman roads.
  • It linked the city of Rome with Brindisi in southeastern Italy.
  • It was approximately 350 miles long.

The student wants to emphasize the distance covered by the Via Appia. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

  • A. A historic Italian road, the Via Appia was finished in 264 BCE.
  • B. The Via Appia was one of the earliest and strategically most important Roman roads.
  • C. The Via Appia, which connected two Italian cities, was constructed between 312 and 264 BCE.
  • D. The approximately 350-mile-long Via Appia linked the Italian cities of Rome and Brindisi.

Answer: D. “The approximately 350-mile-long Via Appia linked the Italian cities of Rome and Brindisi.” is correct. This choice is the only one to mention the specific distance covered by the road ("350-mile-long").

❌ “A historic Italian road, the Via Appia was finished in 264 BCE.” is incorrect. This has no information about the distance covered by the road.

❌ “The Via Appia was one of the earliest and strategically most important Roman roads.” is incorrect. Again, this has no information about the distance covered by the road.

❌ “The Via Appia, which connected two Italian cities, was constructed between 312 and 264 BCE.” is incorrect. Again, no mention is made of the distance covered by the road. Although this answer choice tells us the road connected two cities, we don't know if the Via Appia is 10 miles long or 1000 miles long.

✅ “The approximately 350-mile-long Via Appia linked the Italian cities of Rome and Brindisi.” is correct. This choice is the only one to mention the specific distance covered by the road ("350-mile-long").

In this case, you didn't need to read the bullet points to answer the question. All the information you needed was in the question stem itself.

🔎Here's a slightly harder test-style question:

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:

  • Historical inks are often made from various organic and inorganic materials.
  • Some inks fade or degrade over time due to exposure to light, air, and other environmental factors.
  • Iron gall ink, commonly used for centuries in Europe, is particularly prone to fading and can even corrode the paper it is on.
  • Digital archiving involves creating high-resolution scans of documents to preserve the information they contain.
  • However, some types of historical ink can be difficult to read in digital scans if they have faded significantly.
  • Researchers are working on methods to analyze and enhance faded inks in digital archives.

The student wants to emphasize the specific challenges posed by iron gall ink in the process of digital archiving. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

  • A. Historical inks, made from various organic and inorganic materials, can fade or degrade over time due to environmental factors, posing challenges for digital archiving.
  • B. Iron gall ink, often used in Europe for centuries, is particularly susceptible to fading and corrosion, making the digital archiving of documents written with it difficult.
  • C. Digital archiving involves creating high-resolution scans of documents, but faded historical inks can make the information in these scans difficult to read.
  • D. Researchers are working on methods to analyze and enhance all types of faded inks in digital archives, including iron gall ink.

Answer: B. “Iron gall ink, often used in Europe for centuries, is particularly susceptible to fading and corrosion, making the digital archiving of documents written with it difficult.” is the best answer. It directly emphasizes the challenges posed by iron gall ink, a type of historical ink, in the process of digital archiving.

❌ “Historical inks, made from various organic and inorganic materials, can fade or degrade over time due to environmental factors, posing challenges for digital archiving.” is incorrect. While it does mention the challenges posed by historical inks in general for digital archiving, it does not specifically focus on iron gall ink.

✅ “Iron gall ink, often used in Europe for centuries, is particularly susceptible to fading and corrosion, making the digital archiving of documents written with it difficult.” is the best answer. It directly emphasizes the challenges posed by iron gall ink, a type of historical ink, in the process of digital archiving.

❌ “Digital archiving involves creating high-resolution scans of documents, but faded historical inks can make the information in these scans difficult to read.” is incorrect. This answer choice highlights the general difficulty of dealing with faded inks in digital archiving but does not specifically emphasize the challenges posed by iron gall ink.

❌ “Researchers are working on methods to analyze and enhance all types of faded inks in digital archives, including iron gall ink.” is incorrect. While this choice does mention iron gall ink, it does not center on the specific challenges it poses to the digital archiving process. Instead, it focuses on the general efforts to enhance faded inks in digital archives.

Some emphasis-style rhetorical synthesis questions ask you to emphasize a difference. So far, these questions have included the wording "difference", "contrast", or "differs".

🔎For example:

The student wants to emphasize how the architectural style of the Sydney Opera House differs from that of the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao.

The student wants to contrast the two theories regarding the classification of continents.

The correct answer choice usually includes a key contrast word (such as "whereas", "however" or "but"). Look out for a word like this among the answer choices in the test-style question below.

🔎For example:

✅ A) Whereas the Sydney Opera House features expressionistic, sail-like roofs, the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao showcases a deconstructionist style with curving, intersecting planes.

✅ C) Some theorists classify continents based on cultural and political boundaries; however, others advocate for a geographical approach, emphasizing natural land divisions.
💡 TipWrong answers for difference type rhetorical synthesis questions often emphasize a similarity, rather than a difference.
🔎Here's a test-style question, with the contrast word in the question bolded:

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:

  • The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and NASA both use climate models to predict future environmental changes.
  • These models predict that polar ice will continue to melt, but they disagree about some specifics.
  • The IPCC model predicts that, due to polar ice melt, global sea levels could rise by up to 0.98 meters by 2100.
  • NASA's model predicts a similar rise in sea levels, but it also predicts more frequent and severe weather events.
  • Both models predict that polar ice melt will lead to habitat loss for polar species.
  • The predictions of both models are based on the assumption that global greenhouse gas emissions will continue at their current rate.

The student wants to contrast the predictions of the IPCC and NASA climate models. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

  • A. Like the IPCC, NASA uses climate models to predict future environmental changes, including the melt of polar ice.
  • B. Both the IPCC and NASA models predict a rise in global sea levels and habitat loss for polar species due to polar ice melt.
  • C. The IPCC model focuses on the potential rise in global sea levels due to polar ice melt, while NASA's model also predicts more frequent and severe weather events.
  • D. The predictions of the IPCC and NASA models are based on the assumption that global greenhouse gas emissions will continue at their current rate.

Answer: C. “The IPCC model focuses on the potential rise in global sea levels due to polar ice melt, while NASA's model also predicts more frequent and severe weather events.” is the best answer. This statement contrasts the predictive outcomes of polar ice melt in the IPCC and NASA models, emphasizing that the IPCC model primarily focuses on the potential rise in global sea levels, whereas NASA's model also includes predictions about the frequency and severity of weather events.

❌ “Like the IPCC, NASA uses climate models to predict future environmental changes, including the melt of polar ice.” is incorrect because it does not contrast the predictive outcomes of the two models; it merely states that both use climate models.

❌ “Both the IPCC and NASA models predict a rise in global sea levels and habitat loss for polar species due to polar ice melt.” is incorrect as it states a similarity between the two models' predictions, not a contrast.

✅ “The IPCC model focuses on the potential rise in global sea levels due to polar ice melt, while NASA's model also predicts more frequent and severe weather events.” is the best answer. This statement contrasts the predictive outcomes of polar ice melt in the IPCC and NASA models, emphasizing that the IPCC model primarily focuses on the potential rise in global sea levels, whereas NASA's model also includes predictions about the frequency and severity of weather events.

❌ “The predictions of the IPCC and NASA models are based on the assumption that global greenhouse gas emissions will continue at their current rate.” is incorrect because it discusses the assumption underlying both models' predictions rather than contrasting the models' predictive outcomes.

📝 NoteChoices A and B include the words "like" and "both", respectively—a clue that they are focused on similarity, rather than difference.
💡 TipSo far, 90% of the correct answer choices for rhetorical synthesis questions that ask you to emphasize a difference have included one of the following words: "while", "whereas", "but", or "unlike".

Going forward, it's likely that correct answers could include other contrast words or phrases—for example, "however", "though", "nevertheless", "on the other hand", "conversely", "in contrast", "alternatively", "yet", or "instead".

In hard questions, you may need to use logic to determine the answer.

Some emphasis-style rhetorical synthesis questions ask you to emphasize a similarity. So far, these questions have always included the word "similarity".

It's possible that in the future, such questions may be phrased another way—e.g., they may ask you to identify something that two elements "share" or have "in common".

🔎For example:

The student wants to emphasize a similarity between the two sculptures.
💡 TipWrong answers for similarity-type questions often emphasize a difference, rather than a similarity.
🔎See if you can identify a keyword that emphasizes similarity among the answer choices while solving the test-style question below:

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:

  • In 2007 Cuban American artists Alain Guerra and Neraldo de la Paz created the mixed-media artwork Nine.
  • Nine is a mound of second-hand clothing such as Christmas sweaters and prom dresses.
  • In 2019, Catalan artist Jamie Pitarch created the artwork Momentum.
  • The piece is a reassembled wooden dining chair, standing upside down.
  • The artworks use everyday objects, encouraging viewers to see common items in new, artistic contexts.

The student wants to emphasize the similarity between the artworks. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

  • A. Nine was created in 2007, and Momentum was created in 2019.
  • B. Momentum is a reassembled wooden dining chair, while Nine is a mound of second-hand clothing.
  • C. Catalan artist Jamie Pitarch's artwork Momentum is a reassembled, upside-down wooden dining chair.
  • D. Nine and Momentum both use everyday objects, encouraging viewers to see such items in new, artistic contexts.

Answer: D. “Nine and Momentum both use everyday objects, encouraging viewers to see such items in new, artistic contexts.” is correct. This choice uses the word "both" to emphasize what the artworks have in common: they use everyday objects, encouraging viewers to view such items in a new context.

❌ “Nine was created in 2007, and Momentum was created in 2019.” is incorrect. The sentence indicates that the artworks were created 12 years apart; it doesn't emphasize a similarity between the two artworks.

❌ “Momentum is a reassembled wooden dining chair, while Nine is a mound of second-hand clothing.” is incorrect. This sentence uses "while" to emphasize a difference between Momentum and Nine; it doesn't emphasize a similarity between the two artworks.

❌ “Catalan artist Jamie Pitarch's artwork Momentum is a reassembled, upside-down wooden dining chair.” is incorrect. This sentence only mentions one of the artworks (Momentum), so logically, it cannot emphasize a similarity between them.

✅ “Nine and Momentum both use everyday objects, encouraging viewers to see such items in new, artistic contexts.” is correct. This choice uses the word "both" to emphasize what the artworks have in common: they use everyday objects, encouraging viewers to view such items in a new context.

💡 TipBecause the question asked you to emphasize a "similarity", you should have looked for the word "both" in the answer choices. Choice B includes the word "while"—a clue that it is focused on difference, rather than similarity.
💡 TipSo far, the vast majority of the correct answer choices for rhetorical synthesis questions that ask you to emphasize a similarity have included the word "both".

Going forward, it's likely that correct answers for similarity-type questions could include words such as "also", "like", "likewise", "similarly", "in the same way", or "correspondingly".

On harder questions, you may need to use logical reasoning to determine if an answer choice is emphasizing a similarity.

Around 15-20% of rhetorical synthesis questions involve research studies. To answer these questions correctly, it's important to be familiar with the way such studies are set up and conducted.

Rhetorical synthesis questions about research studies may ask you to talk about a study's results, aim, methodology, or some combination of these.

Results of a Research Study

Some rhetorical synthesis questions will ask you to, for example, "present the study and its findings", "to summarize the study's findings", "present the study's results", or "present the study and its conclusions."

🔎For example:

The student wants to present the study's results.

The student wants to present the study and its findings.

In this context, "findings", "results", and "conclusions" all mean the same thing. They're referring to the major "takeaway" from a study—the primary insight the researchers gained.

🔎Correct answer choices might look as follows:

✅ A) A 2013 analysis of pottery shards found in Harappa, India, suggests that ceramics there may have been developed 4,500 years ago.

✅ A) In a 2021 study, Moreno-Garcia determined that coral fragments found in the Great Barrier Reef had fewer calcification layers relative to the structures of fully mature corals and thus belonged to younger organisms.
💡 TipThe results of a study are often featured in the last (or second-to-last) bullet point.
🔎See if you can identify a keyword that emphasizes the results of a study among the answer choices while solving the test-style question below:

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:

  • A study of web users was conducted by MIT researcher Sinan Aral.
  • Aral wanted to see if web users were susceptible to irrational "herd behavior."
  • The experiment manipulated comments on a news website with false up and down votes.
  • Positive manipulation boosted comments by around 25%.

The student wants to present the results of the study. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

  • A. MIT researcher Sinan Aral conducted a study of web users by manipulating comments on a news website with false up and down votes.
  • B. A study led by MIT researcher Sinan Aral found that positive manipulation of comments on news websites boosted those comments by 25%.
  • C. MIT researcher Sinan Aral wanted to see if web users were susceptible to irrational "herd behavior."
  • D. Web users' behavior was the focus of a study conducted by MIT researcher Sinan Aral.

Answer: B. “A study led by MIT researcher Sinan Aral found that positive manipulation of comments on news websites boosted those comments by 25%.” is correct. This choice presents the study's results—it found that positive manipulation of comments boosted those comments by 25%.

❌ “MIT researcher Sinan Aral conducted a study of web users by manipulating comments on a news website with false up and down votes.” is incorrect. The sentence describes the way the study was conducted, but it does not mention the study's results.

✅ “A study led by MIT researcher Sinan Aral found that positive manipulation of comments on news websites boosted those comments by 25%.” is correct. This choice presents the study's results—it found that positive manipulation of comments boosted those comments by 25%.

❌ “MIT researcher Sinan Aral wanted to see if web users were susceptible to irrational "herd behavior."” is incorrect. This sentence mentions the study's aim, but it does not mention the study's results.

❌ “Web users' behavior was the focus of a study conducted by MIT researcher Sinan Aral.” is incorrect. This sentence describes the study's key focus, but it does not mention the study's results.

💡 TipIf you're asked about the "findings", "results", or "conclusion" of a study, focus on answer choices (and / or bullet points) that include words and phrases like "According to…", "concluded", "confirmed", "determined", "found", "identified", "showed", and "suggests".

Aim of a Research Study

Simply put, the "aim" (or "purpose") of a research study is the goal that the researchers set out to accomplish by conducting the study. In other words, you should be asking yourself "why" the researchers bothered to do the study in the first place.

🔎For example:

The student wants to present the primary aim of the research study.

The student wants to emphasize the aim of the research study.
🔎Correct answer choices might look as follows:

✅ A) Researchers wanted to know whether the Dakotaraptor's feathers evolved to provide insulation.

✅ A) The team hoped to determine the approximate timeline for the domestication of cows.
🔎See if you can identify a keyword that emphasizes the aim of a study among the answer choices while solving the test-style question below:

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:

  • Argentine ants are an invasive species, and control efforts involving poisonous baits have been ineffective.
  • Researchers wanted to boost ants' uptake of poisonous baits by using caffeine.
  • They found that ants that received a caffeine-laced sugary reward navigated more efficiently back to poisonous baits than ants that only received sugar.
  • They tested the impact of different concentrations of caffeine on the ants' ability to locate and relocate a sugary reward in a poisonous bait.
  • Low or intermediate doses of caffeine made the ants more efficient at relocating the reward in the bait.

The student wants to present the primary aim and the main findings of the research study. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

  • A. Researchers incorporated caffeine into ants' sugary reward to test its impact on the ants' ability to locate and relocate a reward.
  • B. Researchers set out to boost ants' uptake of poisonous baits by incorporating caffeine, determining that low or intermediate doses of caffeine made ants more efficient at relocating the reward.
  • C. Caffeinated ants are more efficient at relocating rewards in poisonous baits, a finding that could be used to enhance the effectiveness of such baits.
  • D. Argentine ants are a global invasive species and current control efforts have been ineffective; researchers tested different concentrations of caffeine and its impact on these ants.

Answer: B. “Researchers set out to boost ants' uptake of poisonous baits by incorporating caffeine, determining that low or intermediate doses of caffeine made ants more efficient at relocating the reward.” is the best answer. It clearly outlines the aim of the study (to boost the uptake of poisonous baits by incorporating caffeine) and the key findings (that low or intermediate doses of caffeine made the ants more efficient at relocating the reward).

❌ “Researchers incorporated caffeine into ants' sugary reward to test its impact on the ants' ability to locate and relocate a reward.” is incorrect. While it describes a part of the study's methodology, it does not mention the findings of the study.

✅ “Researchers set out to boost ants' uptake of poisonous baits by incorporating caffeine, determining that low or intermediate doses of caffeine made ants more efficient at relocating the reward.” is the best answer. It clearly outlines the aim of the study (to boost the uptake of poisonous baits by incorporating caffeine) and the key findings (that low or intermediate doses of caffeine made the ants more efficient at relocating the reward).

❌ “Caffeinated ants are more efficient at relocating rewards in poisonous baits, a finding that could be used to enhance the effectiveness of such baits.” is incorrect. It mentions one of the findings but doesn't provide the aim of the study.

❌ “Argentine ants are a global invasive species and current control efforts have been ineffective; researchers tested different concentrations of caffeine and its impact on these ants.” is incorrect. It provides some background information on the problem the study intends to address and part of the methodology but doesn't mention the study's aim or findings.

💡 TipCorrect answer choices for rhetorical synthesis questions that ask you about the "aim" of a study often include some form of the following words: "want", "hope", "seeking", "set out to".

You can also look for such words in the bullet points—they often indicate that a particular bullet point is talking about the aim of a study.

Methodology of a Research Study

The "methodology" of a research study refers to the specific steps, techniques, and processes used by researchers to conduct the investigation.

🔎For example:

The student wants to emphasize the study's methodology.

In essence, you should think about how the study was designed, what data was collected, and how that data was analyzed to arrive at the study's conclusions.

Researchers may have conducted a survey, done a laboratory experiment, or created a computer simulation to do their study.

🔎Correct answer choices might look as follows:

✅ A) In a 2021 study, researchers surveyed 3,000 college students about their social media habits.

✅ A) Sarah Clarke and her team compared the weight of plants that had been exposed to elevated concentrations of atmospheric CO₂ with those that had not.
🔎See if you can identify a keyword that emphasizes the methodology of a study among the answer choices while solving the test-style question below:

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:

  • Researchers examined microplastic ingestion by zooplankton.
  • They wanted to determine what proportion of zooplankton consume microplastics.
  • Zooplankton samples were collected and their gut contents were analyzed microscopically.
  • The research revealed that 3-5% of zooplankton have ingested microplastics.
  • This ingestion can affect zooplankton's feeding and reproductive success.

The student wants to present the study and its methodology. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

  • A. Research showed that 3-5% of zooplankton have ingested microplastics, which can affect their feeding and reproductive success.
  • B. Researchers examined microplastic ingestion by zooplankton, revealing that 3-5% of zooplankton have ingested microplastics.
  • C. Researchers wanted to determine what proportion of zooplankton consume plastics, finding that 3-5% have.
  • D. To determine what proportion of zooplankton consume microplastics, researchers collected zooplankton samples and analyzed their gut contents microscopically.

Answer: D. “To determine what proportion of zooplankton consume microplastics, researchers collected zooplankton samples and analyzed their gut contents microscopically.” is the best answer. This choice effectively outlines the methodology used in the study, emphasizing the steps of collecting zooplankton samples and microscopically analyzing their gut contents.

❌ “Research showed that 3-5% of zooplankton have ingested microplastics, which can affect their feeding and reproductive success.” is incorrect because it only mentions the findings of the study without explaining how those findings were obtained, missing the emphasis on methodology.

❌ “Researchers examined microplastic ingestion by zooplankton, revealing that 3-5% of zooplankton have ingested microplastics.” is also incorrect because it presents the study's results but does not detail the process that led to these results.

❌ “Researchers wanted to determine what proportion of zooplankton consume plastics, finding that 3-5% have.” is incorrect because it only mentions the study's aim and findings rather than its methodology.

✅ “To determine what proportion of zooplankton consume microplastics, researchers collected zooplankton samples and analyzed their gut contents microscopically.” is the best answer. This choice effectively outlines the methodology used in the study, emphasizing the steps of collecting zooplankton samples and microscopically analyzing their gut contents.

💡 TipCorrect answers for methodology-style questions can have a range of possible keywords—reflecting the range of methods researchers can use within their studies.

Here are some common examples: "use", "utilizing", "surveyed', "collected", "analyzed".

Sort each keyword into the goal it signals.

Exercise. Drag each keyword into the goal it signals — or tap it, then tap a goal.

  • but — Difference / Contrast
  • conversely — Difference / Contrast
  • however — Difference / Contrast
  • in contrast — Difference / Contrast
  • instead — Difference / Contrast
  • nevertheless — Difference / Contrast
  • on the other hand — Difference / Contrast
  • though — Difference / Contrast
  • unlike — Difference / Contrast
  • whereas — Difference / Contrast
  • while — Difference / Contrast
  • yet — Difference / Contrast
  • also — Similarity
  • both — Similarity
  • in the same way — Similarity
  • like — Similarity
  • similarly — Similarity
  • concluded — Findings
  • confirmed — Findings
  • determined — Findings
  • found — Findings
  • showed — Findings
  • suggests — Findings
  • hope — Aim
  • seeking — Aim
  • set out to — Aim
  • want — Aim
  • analyzed — Methodology
  • collected — Methodology
  • surveyed — Methodology
  • utilizing — Methodology
  • use — Methodology
Up next
3b. Rhetorical Synthesis: Part 2
Continue →